r4515, yes. r3758, sounds a bit risky. Anything we can do to test
around that change to see if anything was broken?
jim
On Mar 27, 2007, at 8:08 PM, Max Carlson wrote:
I think we should take these...
P T Withington wrote:
Revision: 4515
Bugs Fixed:
LPP-3779 'Misleading Compilation exception syntax error'
Risk: low -- numeric attribute values follow same compilation path
as expressions now
Reward: User-reported bug
Revision: 4518
Bugs Fixed:
LPP-3758 'Java stack trace while compiling malformed JavaScript code'
Risk: low-medium -- Somewhat complicated changes were required to
the parser/compiler interaction to get proper source information
for errors in DHTML
Reward: User-reported bug
--
Regards,
Max Carlson
OpenLaszlo.org
