Well, I want it in. If legal's nightly builds without incident, I
would say it is safe to put in.
On 2007-03-28, at 12:05 EDT, Max Carlson wrote:
Let me know what you want to do with r4518. Henry, don't forget to
send a migration proposal out for your recent changes. The other
ones are in. Mamye, can you spin another 4.0.x build?
Jim Grandy wrote:
r4515, yes. r3758, sounds a bit risky. Anything we can do to test
around that change to see if anything was broken?
jim
On Mar 27, 2007, at 8:08 PM, Max Carlson wrote:
I think we should take these...
P T Withington wrote:
Revision: 4515
Bugs Fixed:
LPP-3779 'Misleading Compilation exception syntax error'
Risk: low -- numeric attribute values follow same compilation
path as expressions now
Reward: User-reported bug
Revision: 4518
Bugs Fixed:
LPP-3758 'Java stack trace while compiling malformed JavaScript
code'
Risk: low-medium -- Somewhat complicated changes were required
to the parser/compiler interaction to get proper source
information for errors in DHTML
Reward: User-reported bug
--Regards,
Max Carlson
OpenLaszlo.org
--
Regards,
Max Carlson
OpenLaszlo.org
