Remember Class.lzs is really just the runtime support for JS2 class
semantics in a JS1 runtime. So the goal is to have that be unused in
a JS2 runtime (like swf9).
On 2008-01-07, at 15:34 EST, P T Withington wrote:
I agree.
I'm just not sure if we need a UserClass (that is a subclass of
view) that these classes inherit from, or if they can just directly
inherit from view (or some other lfc class). There is some stuff
that happens in UserClass that is different from node.
On 2008-01-07, at 15:30 EST, Henry Minsky wrote:
I think the most pragmatic thing to do is to bite the bullet, so to
speak, and make
the tag compiler emit class { .... } declarations for user-defined
classes. It seems like
the alternative would be to use our Class.lzs in swf9 for user-
defined classes
at runtime, which seems like it would cause all sorts of confusion.
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]