So what should we do with traits, I wonder.
On Jan 7, 2008 3:36 PM, P T Withington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remember Class.lzs is really just the runtime support for JS2 class
> semantics in a JS1 runtime. So the goal is to have that be unused in
> a JS2 runtime (like swf9).
>
>
> On 2008-01-07, at 15:34 EST, P T Withington wrote:
>
> > I agree.
> >
> > I'm just not sure if we need a UserClass (that is a subclass of
> > view) that these classes inherit from, or if they can just directly
> > inherit from view (or some other lfc class). There is some stuff
> > that happens in UserClass that is different from node.
> >
> > On 2008-01-07, at 15:30 EST, Henry Minsky wrote:
> >
> >> I think the most pragmatic thing to do is to bite the bullet, so to
> >> speak, and make
> >> the tag compiler emit class { .... } declarations for user-defined
> >> classes. It seems like
> >> the alternative would be to use our Class.lzs in swf9 for user-
> >> defined classes
> >> at runtime, which seems like it would cause all sorts of confusion.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Henry Minsky
> >> Software Architect
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
--
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
