On 12/13/2008 12:00 AM, P T Withington wrote:
On 2008-12-12, at 17:54EST, André Bargull wrote:
On 12/12/2008 11:44 PM, P T Withington wrote:
On 2008-12-12, at 17:26EST, André Bargull wrote:
Will you update the components as part of LPP-7453, or will you
create a new task?
New task. Too close to a release to assess the impact of just
mass-changing the components.
Hm, I don't like this solution, because on the one hand we're
deprecating an attribute so we're saying: "folks stop using this
attribute, we're going to remove it", but on the other hand we don't
really care about what we said and ship a release which makes heavy
use of "isinited" (found 53 times in lps/components).
I don't either, but it's not really that bad. `isinited` was already
marked as private when I got there, so anyone who was using it was
cheating already -- I didn't do any deprecation, just added a new public
API that I hope is what people really were looking for when they found
`isinited`.
It is a private attribute? Oh, I didn't see that, you can just forget my
previous mail.
