In basetabslider.lzx, this comparison looks not quite right

    if ( this.itemclass == "" ){
                this.itemclass = v.constructor;
            }

Shouldn't that check for null rather than empty string?



On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Max Carlson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Change 20100105-maxcarlson-T by maxcarl...@bank on 2010-01-05 14:09:06 PST
>    in /Users/maxcarlson/openlaszlo/trunk-clean
>    for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk
>
> Summary: UPDATED AGAIN: Fix lz/list.lzx to use correct methods for
> instantiating new items
>
> Bugs Fixed: LPP-6002 - lztextlistitem warning/errors of undefined
> properties (title, height, setAttribute), LPP-8690 - Update components to
> use class references directly instead of tagnames (partial)
>
> Technical Reviewer: ptw
> QA Reviewer: hminsky
>
> Details: This has turned into a pretty hairy API-breaking change fairly
> quickly...  Perhaps we should rethink correcting tagname?
>
> Rename *classname to *class.  *class attribute now contains a reference to
> the class that should be created dynamically.  Directly instantiate classes,
> instead of looking up by tagname first.
>
> Tests: Testcase from LPP-6002 no longer warns, component_sampler.lzx
> continues to work.  lzunit-basedatacombobox.lzx runs as before.
>
> Files:
> M       test/components/base/lzunit-basedatacombobox.lzx
> M       lps/components/lz/tabslider.lzx
> M       lps/components/lz/radio.lzx
> M       lps/components/lz/list.lzx
> M       lps/components/lz/tabs.lzx
> M       lps/components/base/basetabelement.lzx
> M       lps/components/base/basecombobox.lzx
> M       lps/components/base/basetabslider.lzx
> M       lps/components/base/baselist.lzx
> M       lps/components/base/basetabs.lzx
> M       lps/components/base/basedatacombobox.lzx
>
> Changeset:
> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20100105-maxcarlson-T.tar
>



-- 
Henry Minsky
Software Architect
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-reviews mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews

Reply via email to