The intent is to ensure drawviews are always behind child sprites. Siblings should layer in their normal lexical order.
Regards, Max Carlson OpenLaszlo.org On 1/26/10 9:51 AM, P T Withington wrote: > Henry has already approved this, but I'm curious: > > I thought the LZX model was that views get stacked in the (lexical) order > they are declared. This change would seem to make it so that a drawview will > always be under any sibling views. Is that the intent, or do I not > understand what is really going on here? > > On 2010-01-25, at 19:57, Max Carlson wrote: > >> Change 20100125-maxcarlson-n by maxcarl...@bank on 2010-01-25 16:55:04 PST >> in /Users/maxcarlson/openlaszlo/trunk-clean >> for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk >> >> Summary: swf9/10: Ensure drawview's container doesn't overlap child sprites >> >> Bugs Fixed: LPP-8731 - Background obscures foreground >> >> Technical Reviewer: hminsky >> QA Reviewer: ptw >> >> Details: Use addChildAt() when creating the drawview container sprite, to >> ensure it's placed behind any other children. >> >> Tests: See LPP-8731 >> >> Files: >> M lps/components/extensions/drawview.lzx >> >> Changeset: >> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20100125-maxcarlson-n.tar >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Laszlo-reviews mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews > _______________________________________________ Laszlo-reviews mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews
