Sorry I'm so thick, but, this seems to imply that a drawview behaves differently than a view. Why does a view not have the same problem?
On 2010-01-26, at 16:10, Max Carlson wrote: > The intent is to ensure drawviews are always behind child sprites. > Siblings should layer in their normal lexical order. > > Regards, > Max Carlson > OpenLaszlo.org > > On 1/26/10 9:51 AM, P T Withington wrote: >> Henry has already approved this, but I'm curious: >> >> I thought the LZX model was that views get stacked in the (lexical) order >> they are declared. This change would seem to make it so that a drawview >> will always be under any sibling views. Is that the intent, or do I not >> understand what is really going on here? >> >> On 2010-01-25, at 19:57, Max Carlson wrote: >> >>> Change 20100125-maxcarlson-n by maxcarl...@bank on 2010-01-25 16:55:04 PST >>> in /Users/maxcarlson/openlaszlo/trunk-clean >>> for http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk >>> >>> Summary: swf9/10: Ensure drawview's container doesn't overlap child sprites >>> >>> Bugs Fixed: LPP-8731 - Background obscures foreground >>> >>> Technical Reviewer: hminsky >>> QA Reviewer: ptw >>> >>> Details: Use addChildAt() when creating the drawview container sprite, to >>> ensure it's placed behind any other children. >>> >>> Tests: See LPP-8731 >>> >>> Files: >>> M lps/components/extensions/drawview.lzx >>> >>> Changeset: >>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/patches/20100125-maxcarlson-n.tar >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Laszlo-reviews mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews >> > _______________________________________________ > Laszlo-reviews mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews _______________________________________________ Laszlo-reviews mailing list [email protected] http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-reviews
