approved On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:03 AM, André Bargull <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 2/12/2011 2:52 PM, P T Withington wrote: > >> On 2011-02-11, at 19:37, André Bargull wrote: >> >> On 2/12/2011 1:23 AM, P T Withington wrote: >>> >>>> On 2011-02-11, at 18:54, André Bargull wrote: >>>> >>>> Publishing LzFormatter as lz.formatter instead of lz.Formatter, hmm >>>>> tricky. I don't know whether this works for the docs, we'll see after the >>>>> next nightly builds. And that also means the reference html-page will now >>>>> be >>>>> named "lz.formatter.html" instead of "lz.Formatter.html" because tag-names >>>>> are preferred for the output. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It works, I tried it. I think it works because the doc-tool lowercases >>>> all the names before turning them into file references. Or so it seems! >>>> >>>> So you'll need to update at least these files (they refer to >>>>> "lz.Formatter.html"): >>>>> docs/src/developers/debugging.dbk >>>>> docs/src/developers/doc-backwards-xform.dbk >>>>> docs/src/developers/text.dbk >>>>> >>>> >>>> But I shall update debugging and text just for safety. >>>> doc-backwards-xform seems to be a generated file? >>>> >>> >>> No, it's not a generated file. It's checked into svn just like a standard >>> file [1]. >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk/docs/src/developers/doc-backwards-xform.dbk >>> >>>> >>>> >> I guess I did not find it because I did not see any references to >> lz.Formatter.html. Am I just missing them? >> > > > No, you didn't miss anything. Apparently I've just added > "doc-backwards-xform.dbk" to the list because it contains a reference to > "LzFormatter" (but not to "lz.Formatter.html"!). So I think it should be > sufficient to update only the other two files. >
