On Aug 20, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 09:07 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:48:27AM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:IIRC, the initial idea was to have only the owner able to promote/ demote admins but then it was agreed that in case an admin misbehaves when theowner is not around, other admins should be able to demote the misbehaver. That's why we allow admins to demote other admins.It's likely an easy fix to allow an admin to make other admins. Is there a reason why we would not want to allow this?Since admins can demote others *and* we send out email notificationswhen a regular member becomes admin, I think it'd be ok to allow adminsto promote others.Yeah, sounds okay to me. Is this documented anywhere?It's not, and people get confused when they realize they can demote but not promote admins. If we allow them to promote as well, the confusionwill stop and we might not need to document it.
I think (hope) Kiko was saying "sounds okay to me" to your suggestion that "it'd be ok to allow admins to promote others" :)
-Barry
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
