On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:13:39 Tom Berger wrote: > On 12 April 2010 06:04, Tim Penhey <[email protected]> wrote: > > As discussed before I'm tackling the JFDI approach and I'm going to get > > the scanner to update the bug-task status [1]. > > > > I'd like the bug-task to be set to in-progress when it is linked to the > > branch, and fix-committed if it is linked to a branch that was marked as > > merged through a merge proposal. > > > > Since the scanner is a script, what do you think the best approach is so > > that the appropriate subscribers get notified? I had a brief look at > > the bug code but it was not clear to me exactly how to proceed. > > I can't find the relevant bug or thread right now, but fwiw this was > previously discussed and iirc the conclusion was that this might not > be desirable. One problem I've had with this approach is that it's > quite easy to link to a wrong bug because of a typo on the command > line, but since the user is likely to not be subscribed to > notifications from the bug in question, they might not discover the > mistake immediately. I'm not sure this is really a deciding factor, > but wanted to make sure I remind you of this problem before you > proceed.
Acknowledged. We are not marking it fix released, just in progress or fix committed Tim _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
