On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Francis J. Lacoste <[email protected]> wrote: > On April 12, 2010, Tim Penhey wrote: >> Hi Deryck, >> >> As discussed before I'm tackling the JFDI approach and I'm going to get the >> scanner to update the bug-task status [1]. >> >> I'd like the bug-task to be set to in-progress when it is linked to the >> branch, and fix-committed if it is linked to a branch that was marked as >> merged through a merge proposal. >> >> Since the scanner is a script, what do you think the best approach is so >> that the appropriate subscribers get notified? I had a brief look at the >> bug code but it was not clear to me exactly how to proceed. >> >> Tim >> >> [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-code/+bug/406692 >> > > Given the number of comments on this thread, I think this is an indication > that the LEP approach would have been more useful: > > """ > You definitely need to follow this process if > > ... > * you have spent more than thirty minutes talking about the change without > doing it > > """
FWIW, I discussed it very briefly with Tim & Deryck before Tim's original post. Fix committed when a revision on trunk or merged into trunk is marked as fixing a bug. I don't care who owns the status change, as long as it's not a lie. That's it. We can look into the "In progress" bit after the "Fix committed" bit lands and is a roaring success. jml _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
