On Monday 02 August 2010 06:33:53 Martin Pool wrote: > On 2 August 2010 11:55, Jeroen Vermeulen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think that it would be valuable to put some performance things to > >> watch out for on that page too. > > > > I'll add a note. > > > > Thanks for doing this. I was still kind of waiting for other solutions > > to show up that might supplant mine (for instance Storm apparently has > > something built in now) but I guess such a thin and convenient interface > > never hurts anyway. It gives us some freedom to mess with > > implementations, too. > > I talked a bit to Jamu at the Rally about collections, and I recall > there being some good reasons why we should use the builtin Storm ones > rather than the Launchpad collection. Unfortunately I left my memory > of the exact differences on the other side of the world but maybe he > can repeat it?
Based on some of the text in https://dev.launchpad.net/Collections I am also a bit concerned that there's some overlap with our utility IXXXSet classes. "Which will mean that you can getUtility(IAllFoo) to start working with a collection. " This is functionally identical to getUtility(IFooSet) which is our existing pattern for collections (and there's webservice exports for those too). I'm sure there's a good reason for all of this, but I don't get it I'm afraid, can you educate this dunce? J _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
