On 09/14/2010 08:22 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Maris Fogels > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, ec2 is running Lucid. We had been wanting to do that upgrade for a >> while. >> I don't think you can work around problems like this until we are fully >> upgraded. >> >> Since buildbot is now running Lucid, running Hardy in EC2 would still cause >> problems when moving off of dev (Lucid) to EC2 (Hardy) then back to buildbot >> (Lucid again). >> >> Is there a better solution that running Hardy and Lucid side-by-side in >> buildbot, and let BB sort out any issues? > > That would be ok, but BB has to get*two* votes to approve a branch, not one. > > Right now I think it needs only one vote. > > -Rob
Well, we could say that for a branch to get promoted from devel to stable only one vote counts: the Hardy builder vote. We can still run the lucid builders, just keep them from committing changes to PQM. (Disclaimer: I can't recall the specifics at this moment, but I think the system is already set up this way: code only passes from devel -> lucid_lp -> stable. We can change that so code only passes from devel -> lp -> stable.) -- Māris Fogels -- https://launchpad.net/~mars Launchpad.net -- cross-project collaboration and hosting
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
