On 23/09/10 14:19, Martin Pool wrote: > I just noticed today there's something like 40 approved ready-to-land > reviews on <https://code.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+activereviews>, > with about 10 over a month old. It seems like a lot.... Why do you > suppose they sit there for so long? >
One reason is lack of process enforcement. I realise launchpad tries to be fairly loose with mandating process and relies on social enforcement. But maybe an option could/should be added? To stop people forgetting to land their approved branches, should nag emails to the proposer be sent out after a set time has elapsed? Then, after X emails with no action, perhaps an email to the project owner? Or something? In terms of RACI methodology (responsible/accountable/consulted/informed), if there is no one accountable for managing a certain change/action (in this case landing a branch), then there's strong likelihood it won't get done. Just some thoughts. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
