On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Ian Booth <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23/09/10 14:19, Martin Pool wrote: >> I just noticed today there's something like 40 approved ready-to-land >> reviews on <https://code.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+activereviews>, >> with about 10 over a month old. It seems like a lot.... Why do you >> suppose they sit there for so long? >> > > One reason is lack of process enforcement. I realise launchpad tries to > be fairly loose with mandating process and relies on social enforcement. > But maybe an option could/should be added? To stop people forgetting to > land their approved branches, should nag emails to the proposer be sent > out after a set time has elapsed? Then, after X emails with no action, > perhaps an email to the project owner? Or something? > > In terms of RACI methodology > (responsible/accountable/consulted/informed), if there is no one > accountable for managing a certain change/action (in this case landing a > branch), then there's strong likelihood it won't get done.
Devs are responsible for landing their own branches; the big issue IMO is that landing is traumatic ATM. -Rob _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
