On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 16:41 +1300, Robert Collins wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:05 PM, William Grant <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> This would chop 4 hours off the time that things take to deploy, > >> remove one buildbot queue and generally make the whole code->live > >> story a bit simpler, at the cost of making the security-fix story more > >> complex. Personally, I think that that is a net win. > > > > It's not just security fixes that need this sort of treatment. See, for > > example, jtv's recent emergency Codehosting fix: it needed to skip ahead > > of un-QA'd revisions. Cowboying may be appropriate here too. I don't > > really know. > > So really, we're saying that there are two sorts of changes: > - must-deploy-asap > - deploy-with-due-care > > Jeroen's fix could well have gone the deploy with due care course, > once we've got that down to a matter of hours. But it could have gone > asap too.
How can that get down to a few hours? That would require that everything be QA'd moments after it lands. William.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
