On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:46 PM, William Grant <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 16:41 +1300, Robert Collins wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:05 PM, William Grant <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> This would chop 4 hours off the time that things take to deploy, >> >> remove one buildbot queue and generally make the whole code->live >> >> story a bit simpler, at the cost of making the security-fix story more >> >> complex. Personally, I think that that is a net win. >> > >> > It's not just security fixes that need this sort of treatment. See, for >> > example, jtv's recent emergency Codehosting fix: it needed to skip ahead >> > of un-QA'd revisions. Cowboying may be appropriate here too. I don't >> > really know. >> >> So really, we're saying that there are two sorts of changes: >> - must-deploy-asap >> - deploy-with-due-care >> >> Jeroen's fix could well have gone the deploy with due care course, >> once we've got that down to a matter of hours. But it could have gone >> asap too. > > How can that get down to a few hours? That would require that everything > be QA'd moments after it lands.
Exactly. -Rob _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
