On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Julian Edwards <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 22 October 2010 04:02:41 Robert Collins wrote: >> I do like the idea of catching problems early, but let's do that >> explicitly: I will review *all* unreviewed landings (other than ones I >> do) in the two weeks, and if I land anything unreviewied, someone else >> - say jml - can review those. >> - javascript reviews >> - sure, let's leave them out of scope > > Can anyone remember why we abandoned [r=trivial] ? > > >From what I remember of it, we seemed to use it for more than just "trivial" > branches; i.e. mechanical changes etc., and I reckon what we were doing back > then is not too dissimilar to Rob's proposal. >
Actually, I don't think this is what Rob is proposing. I think he is saying qualified contributors can take reviews at their discretion. Period. Cheers, deryck -- Deryck Hodge https://launchpad.net/~deryck http://www.devurandom.org/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
