On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Robert Collins
<[email protected]> wrote:

> What do you think?

+1

I wouldn't bother formalizing what goes through review and what
doesn't. If it obviously won't benefit from a review, it obviously
won't benefit from a review. If it isn't obvious, review. This rule
seems to work well enough for me when I 'rs=stub' stuff in
database/schema or database/replication (or at least nobody has
complained yet). 'rs=me' empowers developers to take responsibility
for their actions. I'm not sure if we need formal oversight, or if we
already have enough eyes on the code to keep things sane.


-- 
Stuart Bishop <[email protected]>
http://www.stuartbishop.net/

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to