* Robert Collins <[email protected]> [2010-11-03 03:48 +1300]: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Francis J. Lacoste > <[email protected]> wrote: > > lp isn't a namespace package in Launchpad. I guess that's what Robert is > > hinting at by the "no good story". It was meant to be, but it seems that we > > added .py directly in it, at some point. And it misses the namespace > > registration declaration. I've filed bug 669938 about this. > > > > In the mean time, we could use a lpx namespace for applications building on > > top of Launchpad? > > I'd be fine with having a namespace package for lpx, fwiw. I think > that would be better in fact, than having external trees directly > injecting code into 'lp'.
I like it, my concern is mostly to be consistent with Launchpad moving forward. For example, since I have a fixation with the Librarian, would it make sense if I eventually extracted it as a standalone package to have it also reside under the lpx namespace? -- Marc Tardif <[email protected]> Freenode: cr3, Jabber: [email protected] 1024D/72679CAD 09A9 D871 F7C4 A18F AC08 674D 2B73 740C 7267 9CAD _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
