On November 2, 2010, Marc Tardif wrote: > * Robert Collins <[email protected]> [2010-11-03 03:48 +1300]: > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Francis J. Lacoste > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > lp isn't a namespace package in Launchpad. I guess that's what Robert > > > is hinting at by the "no good story". It was meant to be, but it seems > > > that we added .py directly in it, at some point. And it misses the > > > namespace registration declaration. I've filed bug 669938 about this. > > > > > > In the mean time, we could use a lpx namespace for applications > > > building on top of Launchpad? > > > > I'd be fine with having a namespace package for lpx, fwiw. I think > > that would be better in fact, than having external trees directly > > injecting code into 'lp'. > > I like it, my concern is mostly to be consistent with Launchpad moving > forward. For example, since I have a fixation with the Librarian, would > it make sense if I eventually extracted it as a standalone package to > have it also reside under the lpx namespace?
I don't think the librarian is something that would be released under lpx. Since it's in a way a generic thing, lazr pour make more sense. -- Francis J. Lacoste [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
