On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Daniel Hollocher <[email protected]> wrote: >> It's quite possible that this thinking might prompt us to consider >> changing Launchpad, perhaps in significant ways. (e.g. one proposal is >> to combine "Confirmed" and "Triaged"). >> > > One idea that I have had in the back of my mind is to have an upstream > setting for a bug. > Right now, my understanding is that a bug is marked triaged, low priority, > possibly assigned to a team, and an external bug watch is created. > I feel bad when users see all that, but have no idea it means that the bug > should be worked on upstream and get frustrated because it looks like the > bug is being ignored. A common rant is "why is this bug marked low!? It > should be marked high." > So if it was clearer that a bug is upstream, like in the same way bug > duplicates are handled, then users can direct their energy > more appropriately. >
Thanks, that's a good idea. Although, my experience is that if you are going to be open about your development priorities, you will always disappoint someone. :) jml _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
