[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998 21:14:16 EST DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-03-10 19:55:12 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
><< However, now that
> time has passed and she has remained under the cloud of suspicion and
>has
> had to stay in Massachussetts while the appeal was being prepared
>makes
> me feel that the best thing is to end it here, leave things as they
>were
> decided by the judge and let her go home. >>
>
>If I were a gambler, that's the outcome I'd bet on. (Me, I bet the
>favorite
>to show -- old "sure thing" kid here.) Seems the best of the
>available
>alternatives.
>Doc
Hi Doc,
The primary factor might be that they argued both appeals before the same
court at the same time. Pretty easy to compromise on the ruling under
those circumstances. If neither side could offer a strongly compelling
reason, then the logical thing is to let the ruling stand.
Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
