[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hello Doctor,
My initial opinion was that the judge was correct to have reduced the
verdict to manslaughter but should have sentenced her to spend a few
years in prison thinking about what she had done. I'm convinced that she
did have a role in the baby's death, although the information about the
prior injury has me wondering just how big of a role. However, now that
time has passed and she has remained under the cloud of suspicion and has
had to stay in Massachussetts while the appeal was being prepared makes
me feel that the best thing is to end it here, leave things as they were
decided by the judge and let her go home.
Certainly a new trial would be a tremendous emotional burden for the
parents. Much more so than thinking that Woodward got off easy, IMO.
Bill
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998 14:54:57 -0800 "Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>"Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill - re your post on just leaving things the way they are being
>possibly the best way to go, this is just what I hear Courttv
>commentators say is likely to happen. They don't always predict, so
>we'll see. Did you mean to include the supension of sentence, that is
>confining it to the amount of time already served? My guess is that
>you
>do, because that would be retaining the status quo, but it would be
>good
>to hear your thoughts. That's a matter than has some riled, one
>observes. :) LDMF.
>
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
