[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hi Terry:
>
>Sounds like good old political talking to me. LOL
>
>Seriously though there isn't any way to prove one way or the other if
>Hillary knew what was going on, unless she talked to someone about it.
>
>Sue
OK, Sue, seriously. When a lawyer takes part in a swindle it seems
farfetched to claim they were ignorant of what was going on. When the
elements of a swindle or bribery are proven, a participant should have to
show why they were ignorant just as a killer has to prove insanity. It
won't work that way for Hillary but it does for ordinary people.
Best, Terry
"Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
