Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
My question still remains, if she is keeping quiet because of Clinton.
Why? He obviously has proven to her that he isn't going to help her in
any way. I just can't see why anyone would spend time in jail, be
treated the way she was, and know that it may happen again if she
doesn't testify, unless what she is saying is the truth, or her life is
in danger.
I don't know anyone that I would do this for. And if nothing else I am
loyal to my friends. But this is beyond loyalty, IMO.
If her life was in danger the best thing she could do is testify, and
let everyone know this, as well as who was threatening her. That in
itself would remove the threat, IMO.
She has a new boyfriend whom she plans to marry as soon as her prison
term is over. She only has a few more months to go, and then she can
put all of this behind her and go off into the sunset with her new
husband and start a new life. Why would she jeopardize this unless
there was a very good reason. Clinton's friendship certainly doesn't
seem like a good enough reason to jeopardize this, IMO.
Sue
> HI Sue,
>
> Once again, you are correct. She completed her 18 month sentence on the
> contempt of court ruling and is now serving the sentence for the crime
> she was convicted of.
>
> If she really is keeping quiet to protect Clinton one might wonder why a
> presidential pardon was not part of the deal.
>
> Bill
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
