[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
Yep, and the Clinton haters can't stand it. If Starr had evidence to
impeach McDougal's testimony then he wouldn't need her testimony, would
he? He wants to force her to lie and implicate Clinton because he has NO
evidence to do this on its own merits.
Bill
On Sat, 25 Apr 1998 14:01:57 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill:
>
>I bet that there ends up being a whole library of books that come out
>of
>this mess. And the one book that everyone will be waiting for is one
>from Hillary. (she won't write one though)
>
>Susan McDougal won't be made to testify again, IMO. Starr can't
>handle
>anymore public scorn, no one will believe her no matter what she says,
>and it just doesn't make sense to jail her again.
>
>If Starr has information that will get the Clintons, I doubt that
>anything that Susan has to say will make any difference one way or the
>other.
>
>Sue
>> HI Sue,
>>
>> Excellent questions. She's not going to be hurting for money
>because she
>> can sell her story as a book and probably a movie. I think that
>there
>> will be a lot more information coming out about Mr. Starr and his
>> investigating tactics with respect to Susan McDougal. And with his
>> approval rating at a very low level now, this may just be the straw
>that
>> breaks the elephant's back.
>>
>> Bill
>
>
>--
>Two rules in life:
>
>1. Don't tell people everything you know.
>2.
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
