"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: They instead are throwing their support to the case that is presently before the Supreme Court, and are going before Congress, etc and lobbying for harder laws concerning this. Sue Good for NOW. This case, supported by NOW, could be potentially much more harmful to Clinton than Paula Jones case, especially in the Wiley mauling. Ron 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula J... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones hallinan
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I NOW Will Not Back Paula Jones Ronald Helm