Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Jackie:
Now the Pentagon is looking into Linda Tripp's background, saying
something like, she didn't mention that she had been arrested once. And
they released some of the transcripts today of Clintons, and the women.
To top it off when the press asked Starr today what he thought about the
stories of Tripp having been arrested he said that we should "remember
that everyone has the obligation to remember to presume innocence until
proven differently." Why wasn't that thought of when Clinton was the
one on the hot seat, not that he still isn't.
Our front paper had a line up today of the women involved in this, and
there were six of them, with a note saying that there were others that
weren't photographed.
All I can ask at this point, is when did he have time to do his job. :)
I like the idea of your lawsuit. I'll be your expert witness, ok? Just
as good as any other expert witness, IMO. Just tell me what you want me
to say. <BG>
Sue
>
> Hi Sue
>
> I heard the same about the Willey woman being the big problem for the w.h. But,
>again,
> why wait till now?? Didn't the job she alledgedly got because of Clinton quite what
>she
> thought it would be?? Let's look at the major actors so far: Tripp, the motherly
>woman
> who draws sexually harassed women to her like a moth to a flame; Paula, who seems
>to be
> pouting because she didn't receive flowers and is so emotionally distraught--but
>doesn't
> forget to smile for the cameras at all times; Monica, who admits being a pathological
> liar; now Willey whose deposition is pretty vague except for remembering one thing
> clearly; and Clinton who says he is vague about all of it. What a circus.
>
> Maybe I should sue Clinton maintaining that I am suffering from great emotional
>stress
> because he didn't include me in his overtures to women and my self-esteem as a woman
>has
> suffered ever since--how many years is it, now? Of course, I will have to wait until
> after discovery to see a doctor for my condition--didn't need one until now to get
>over
> my deep emotional stress. Of course, going on shopping sprees might help--I could
>have
> one of those beauty makeovers--the one that costs $1,500 or so. I know this sounds
> silly, but in a circus like this, it might fly. Good heavens, now they are putting
> hearsay evidence into a court document--one of the women's friends deposition.
>Excuse
> me. And sometimes I think Clinton is an accident waiting to happen in his response
>to
> this mess. Walking a political and a legal fence at the same time tends to do this,
>I
> would imagine.
>
> jackief
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
