[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998 04:15:13 -0600 Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill
>
>Thank you a hundred times. This article is definitely one for me to
>look
>at. I am going to the library today or tomorrow (the public one) and
>will
>get it if they carry Life. The twins you are talking about I think
>are part
>of the study carried on by the researcher in Mpls, MN. He is at the U
>of M,
>can't think of his name, but he has been studying twins for years now,
>especially separated twins at birth. But, like you, I do agree with
>the fact
>that their adoptive environments would be similar in some ways--poor
>people
>do not adopt children usually, so similar in socioeconomic status
>would play
>a role I would think. Also, babies in those days were matched to
>adoptive
>parents much more than today. But I definitely will get the issue of
>Life.
>
>jackief
HI Jackie,
You're welcome! It's a fascinating subject with lots and lots of
variables. For example, just the experience of BEING adopted would count
as an environmental variable. I'm sure you'll find that article quite
intersting.
Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
