[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 17 Mar 1998 16:34:28 EST DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-03-17 12:07:41 EST, you write:
>
><< I wouldn't be suprised to
> learn that he made some sort of pass at her, >>
>
>In general I find blaming the victim abhorrent, but really -- how many
>of
>these women have allowed themselves to be alone with a man they all
>seem to
>agree is a womanizer, and how many of them can honestly be surprised
>if under
>those circumstances he womanizes? Sure, he shouldn't. We all know
>that. But
>can we really react with shock and dismay? If there were coercion,
>yes. If
>there were even a threat of retaliation for refusal, yes.
>But...............
>Doc -- who may just be blase and lack understanding
HI Doc,
I agree and it's obvious that these alleged incidents are more useful in
a political sense as Clinton's enemies attempt to cause him problems than
they are indicative of any horrible events or actual crimes.
Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
