On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 01:28, Paul Ishenin <webpi...@mail.ru> wrote: > Martin Friebe wrote: >> >> Hm, while some of them probably are most likely to be used to find >> possible issues, there is no need to see them as an "problem indicator" >> only. >> So point 1 is "correct" as they are a collecion of numbers "figures" >> >> Still, maybe they would be better named as "statistics"? (maybe >> "analytics" ?) > I would call them "IDE Hints" or "Code Hints". But "Figures" are also ok > for me.
My main point with the name is usability. The name should convey at least something about the named object to an unprepared reader -- this is an important rule both in programming and interface design. So yes, 'code hints', 'analytics' -- anything suggested in this thread is better than 'figures'. (Not 'statistics', however, which, by the way, would be another interesting feature) -- Alexander S. Klenin _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus