On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Sven Barth via Lazarus <lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > On 13.10.2017 21:32, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: >> [...] >> >> IMHO, would be better if packages may have just some "exported units". >> What do you think? > > It doesn't matter. Any symbols in a unit are mangled only locally to the > unit and there *can not* be two or more symbols with the same name in > one program. What you ask for is simply not possible.
Is it not possible *today* or never? I don't know how the compiler works, but try to understand me: I would like to modularize a big program in small packages — because it's better than to use dll/so. Each one these packages will work in a bounded context. Each one may have a "Facade" to the main program, exposing its "interface" (classes and interfaces, most). So, the main program shouldn't know nothing about "private units" that belongs only for the package. That is encapsulation too. Best regards, Marcos Douglas -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
