> I think I had this discussion before: I'm not going to use TBytes until it offers the same convenience as an ansistring (i.e. easy concatenation, insertion and deletion, not to mention search and replace, etc.).
Isn't RawByteString a more suited replacement then? In the few places i relied on the bytes in a string when i was converting my code from FPC 2.x to FPC 3.x i used a RawByteString and things seem to work fine.
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
