El 10/12/17 a les 15:02, Kostas Michalopoulos via Lazarus ha escrit:
> I think I had this discussion before: I'm not going to use TBytes until it offers the same convenience as an ansistring (i.e. easy concatenation, insertion and deletion, not to mention search and replace, etc.).

Isn't RawByteString a more suited replacement then? In the few places i relied on the bytes in a string when i was converting my code from FPC 2.x to FPC 3.x i used a RawByteString and things seem to work fine.



https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/system/rawbytestring.html

it's an ansistring.

Bye
--
Luca Olivetti
Wetron Automation Technology http://www.wetron.es/
Tel. +34 93 5883004 (Ext.3010)  Fax +34 93 5883007
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to