Alexander Klenin schrieb:
1) Proposed syntax seems somewhat suboptimal. Historically, Pascal
used redundancy and keywords to minimize the chance of errors and
make diagnostics easier. In that spirit, I think some active indication
of arbitrary upper bound is preferable to a mere omission:
IDECommandStrs: array[0..*] of TIdentMapEntry = (
IDECommandStrs: array[0..auto] of TIdentMapEntry = (
IDECommandStrs: array[0..end] of TIdentMapEntry = (
I would vote for "auto".
I wont, since the following would fail:
const
auto = 10;
arr: [1..auto] of Integer = (1, 2, 3);
I would go for
arr: [1..] of Integer = (1, 2, 3);
Marc
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
