Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
That's an issue, yes. Although, in this case the constant "auto" could
be independend from the keyword "auto". So it would not fail. Instead
constant and array size would not be related in any way (although it
appears like that).
I can't. How compiler will decide whether this is a constant 'auto' or a
keyword inside the const declaration?
I would go for
arr: [1..] of Integer = (1, 2, 3);
Maybe, but this can lead to ocasional errors. What if developer forgot
to write the paticular value on which program execution depends.
I would use arr[] of Integer as in C. This would also simplify code
porting :)
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
