On 29 May 2010 06:41, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: > for documentation or other purposes. But when this is no more true, the > discussion could be resurrected?
So what are the main reasons nobody wants to use the fcl-passrc parser? Except the obviously lack of some language syntax - which I think should be easier and quicker to add, than to try and modularize the compiler's parser. I would also imagine the fcl-passrc parser should be easier to maintain that something that has deep ties in the compiler workings itself. -- Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
