Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
[email protected] schrieb:
I don't think you should provide for this. This is encouraging people to
write bad code. They should get an error, and correct their code.
Agree.
I also don't understand why it is needed to manually free and
set nil an object pointer if a destructor for the object exists
which should do all this. This is like writing another destructor
and makes object oriented programming (even more) useless.
On 15-1-2005 I had a heavy discussion with Mattias about this. IMO it
was needed for a design flaw and he couldn't convince me why it was
needed. I won't start that discussion again.
Marc
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
