On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 19:19, Jürgen Hestermann <[email protected]> wrote: > I also don't understand why it is needed to manually free and > set nil an object pointer if a destructor for the object exists > which should do all this. This is like writing another destructor > and makes object oriented programming (even more) useless.
No, the destructor can not change the object pointer. That is the whole point. -- Alexander S. Klenin -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
