On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:58:44 +0200 Michael Schnell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 04:59 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > > > Please read a book about parallel programming. > Not necessary. I don't argue about the technical implications of thread > programming and code sequences. > > This is just a matter of wording. I do believe that we both know about > the technology in question. So lets just invent another term instead of > "thread safe" that can be defined in a way that it does make sense with > Objects. :) Sigh. It already does. See my TThreadList.Add example. If you need a term for a method with less thread safety you might look for reentrant or thread local. Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
