On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:26:07 +0200 Michael Schnell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 12:02 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > Why do you think so? > Sorry I have been typing much faster than thinking here (again). I had > meant to be talking about TTlist. :-[ :-[ :-[ Your mails contain so many confusions - "TThread.Add", "completely thread safe", "separate-instance-thread safe", TList with TThreadList and now "TTlist". You are a very confused troll. This thread started about "thread safe" LCL functions. If you want that FCL functions/methods be documented whether they are thread safe or not you can ask on the fpc lists or create a feature request. >[...] > Simply stating that TList.Add is "not thread save" (which of course is > perfectly correct) would prevent using a TList instance as a data store > e.g. in a thread class that itself is instantiated multiple times. There > using TThreadList would be overkill. Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
