On 03/1/12 5:43, Mattias Gaertner wrote:

The term "circle" was translated from German graph theory, but the
common words in English graph theory are "cycle" and "cyclic".

I'm not familiar with graph theory and the possibly specialist technical meanings given there to words in common use.

However, in everyday English neither of the nouns 'cycle' or 'circle' has the meaning 'mutual interdependence' except perhaps as a curious extension of the metaphor which works poorly if at all.

Whereas the adjective 'circular' can carry a meaning of 'interdependent' or 'dependent on itself'. So a 'circular argument' is flawed in that it refers to itself rather than to an independently established proposition. But in English you would not normally refer to such a circular argument as a 'circle' and expect people (apart perhaps from graph theorists?) to appreciate immediately what you meant.

Dependency (or interdependency) is the more descriptive term, which does not rely on a strained metaphor - although 'mutual dependency' is rather a mouthful.


--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to