On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich <drdiettri...@aol.com> wrote: > I only remember that you stated that you don't like such notes.
It is not about liking, I think it is just plainly obvious that if someone downloads our software and builds our docs, presses F1 and reads [really?] it makes us look ridiculous so it is not acceptable to have that in our documentation. > Such an entry is absolutely useless without instructions *what* should be > implemented at all. If you can't see that yourself, then you better keep > your hands off the documentation. It doesn't matter if it wasnt good before. Your [?] tags make it worse. >> <p>[this looks outdated?] >> It is not outdated. > Thanks for confirming your ignorance :-( ... > If you had taken a look at Arc(), you certainly had noticed that the > parameters "angle1" and "angle2" do not exist any more. Do you need better > glasses? function Arc(DC: HDC; Left,Top,Right,Bottom,Angle16Deg, Angle16DegLength: Integer): Boolean; {$IFDEF IF_BASE_MEMBER}virtual;{$ENDIF} Then just change it to Angle16Deg and Angle16DegLength. From reading "looks outdated" how am I supposed to know that you mean that the parameter name is slightlt wrong? As far as I remember I wrote this documentation, and it is not outdated, I just made a copy+paste error in the parameter name because the function is nearly identical to its twin sister from TCanvas and I was documenting both at the same time. -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus