Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
> It is not about liking, I think it is just plainly obvious that if
> someone downloads our software and builds our docs, presses F1 and
> reads [really?] it makes us look ridiculous so it is not acceptable to
> have that in our documentation.
Well, my opinion is: I would prefer to have a hint that something is
wrong in the documentation instead of letting me believe it is correct
if it's not. It's a kind of "watch out" which lets me have a closer look
when things do not work as expected. If you don't want this in the
documentation then *correct* it instead of reverting back to faulty
documentation.
>> Such an entry is absolutely useless without instructions *what*
should be
>> implemented at all.
That's the problem: If someone knows that it cannot be as documented it
does not automatically mean that he knows how it would be correct. Still
I would prefer to be informed about a documentation error instead of
letting me believe wrong things.
> It doesn't matter if it wasnt good before. Your [?] tags make it worse.
I don't think so. It may be not very elegant. But you made it worse
again. Why didn't you take the hint and correct the documenation? That
would have been a real improvement.
> Then just change it to Angle16Deg and Angle16DegLength. From reading
> "looks outdated" how am I supposed to know that you mean that the
> parameter name is slightlt wrong?
If you don't know this how should others know it?
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
