On 10/31/06, A.J. Venter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually though -for me personally, QT would be a more important - once KDE4
is out, openlab WILL switch, and nothing would make me happier than to
migrate wole, olad and the installer to QT instead - maximum integration.
I don´t want to rain on your parade, but I think there are several
factors that make this bounty more suitable to Gtk2, such as:
* Qt is still too far from running Lazarus stably.
* Gtk 2 has a better license scheme, so It´s more suitable to write
proprietary software.
You don´t need a Qt Lazarus IDE to build software for Qt-LCL. Also, as
Qt-LCL already supports Utf-8, a fully-working Gtk2 IDE will make
development for Qt easier.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
