On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 01:36:59 +0100
Giuliano Colla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giuliano Colla ha scritto:
> >> The FBaseBounds are sometimes wrong in 0.9.24. This has been fixed
> >> in svn.
> >> Did you test with the current 0.9.25?
> >>
> >>
> > Yes. I saw no changed behavior since r 12699 until your modified it
> > in r 13219.
> > However, as I have an app which shows the problem, I can try to
> > trace what happens with FBaseBounds, and provide more information.
> >
> I've made my test, checking just FBaseBounds.Top, because it's the
> one relevant in my app.
> What happens is the following:
> The two widgets created with the form, which are top aligned, have
> the same value for Top and for FBaseBounds.Top (i.e. 1 for the first
> and 43 for the second).
Can you send me the test example?
> All the other widgets are created run-time, and initially set bottom
> aligned, have the correct value for the Top property (corresponding
> to their position) and 0 in FbaseBound.Top.
> So when one of them is set top aligned, if FBaseBounds.Top is used, 0
> is < 1 and the widget goes above the first one, instead of below. If
> the top property is used instead, the widget goes in the right place.
> I didn't investigate further, but it seems to me that if a widget has
> a top property of 350 and FBaseBound.top = 0 and if FBaseBound.top
> must be used to know where the widget is, there must be a bug
> somewhere.
Yes.
Mattias
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
