As far as ensuring MAC address and other guest domain's properties
consistency across physical nodes is concerned, this is onetime
activity. Using the following steps, one can make sure that MAC address
is same across all physical nodes when a guest domain is made HA under
VCS configuration.

If a virtual network of a guest domain is assigned a MAC address
(belonging to 00:14:4f:fc:00:00-00:14:4f:ff:ff:ff range) manually, the
same address can be used on other physical nodes for the guest domain.
If user opts to let ldm software assign the MAC address, then this MAC
address cannot be assigned to the guest domain on other nodes.

After assigning the MAC address manually and configuring the LDom
completely on one node, the LDom configuration can be exported in XML
format (ldm list-constraints -x ldom > ldom-config.xml). This
configuration file can be replicated on other physical nodes or kept on
shared disk so that other nodes have visibility to the file. The path of
the configuration file can be specified in the LDom resource
configuration. If the guest domain is not already created where VCS
brings the guest domain online, VCS will create the guest domain with
same MAC address and other properties.

Alternately, user can choose to manually create the guest domain using
the exported configuration file (ldm add-domain -i ldom-config.xml).

Vikas.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:ldoms-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Octave
Orgeron
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 3:13 PM
To: Ashutosh Tripathi; Paul Roberts
Cc: ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [ldoms-discuss] LDOM "Clustering"

Hi Everyone,

Take a look at this wiki which has details on SC support for LDoms:

http://wikis.sun.com/display/SunCluster/Sun+Cluster+3.2+2-08+Release+Not
es#SunCluster3.22-08ReleaseNotes-optguestdomain

The main thing to keep in mind is that you fail-over your applications
between guest domains with SC. In that regard it's no different than if
you have two stand-alone servers that are clustered, you fail-over the
applications. 

Keeping the LDM configuration in-sync between multiple servers is not
possible with SC or even VCS. I would see that as a key requirement in
doing a full blown fail-over of a guest domain.

VCS simply allows you to start/stop a guest domain that's already
configured between the hosts. You can install VCS in "stand-alone" mode
in your guest domains and have each guest domain be a "remote" resource
in a cluster. So you could move a guest domain between hosts, but all
the infrastructure (disks, networking, etc.) would have to be available
across all hosts. It won't do any sanity checks for things like mac
addresses, ldm configuration, etc. .. so it still requires one to be
careful.

Now on the flip side, in the future we'll have the ability to move a
guest domain from one physical host to another without any clustering
software. This will be known as "Live Migration". It has been mentioned
a few times in our forum here. But basically, it'll give us a Vmotion
type of functionality. That should probably be leveraged for moving a
whole guest domain between servers. 

It is important to understand the difference between HA clustering and
the mobility of virtual machines.. they are different things:) Much in
the way that VMWare Vmotion is not HA clustering.. it's a method of
making a virtual machine mobile:) It has no ability to monitor your
applications and services within your virtual machine. This is where HA
clustering for applications and services should come into play.

 *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Octave J. Orgeron
Solaris Systems Engineer
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/sysadmin/
http://unixconsole.blogspot.com
unixconsole at yahoo.com
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*



----- Original Message ----
From: Ashutosh Tripathi <[email protected]>
To: Paul Roberts <P.Roberts at Sun.COM>
Cc: ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 6:03:54 PM
Subject: Re: [ldoms-discuss] LDOM "Clustering"

Hi Paul,

    Currently, to make a LDoms guest domain HA, you would
run SC inside that guest domain, essentially treating it
as a SC "node". If that "node" fails, all services within it
would be failed over to other "node"s in the cluster and
achieve HA that way.

    What you are suggesting is closer to the "Failover Guest
domain" model (similar to "Failover Zones" model you seem to be
alluding to). That is currently not possible, but we are
looking very actively into it.

Check out my blog entry:
http://blogs.sun.com/SC/entry/ldoms_guest_domains_supported_as

and comments on that entry. It seems several people are interested
in it. Given that you are internal to SUN, can you contact me
offline with your specific customer needs? That would help us
prepare a business case and help move this along?

Thanks,
-ashu


Paul Roberts wrote:
> I've been searching for a while now regarding the best way to have HA 
> LDOMs.  Currently, we are able to implement this solution:
> 
> - 2 Physical Hosts - Node A and Node B
> - Each running Sun Cluster 3.2
> - Using HAStoragePlus agent with ZFS + Zones (SUNWsczone)
> - We're able to fail a zone/container over from Node A to Node B
easily 
> and it works great and very easy to maintain
> 
> Is there any way today to fail an LDOM over in the same manner? 
>  Meaning, can I have ldm installed on both nodes and when one node
(Node 
> A) goes down or I decide to failover the LDOM automatically comes up
and 
> mounts the appropriate storage on the other node (Node B)?  I
apologize 
> if I am not being clear enough - feel free to ping me to ask more
questions.
> 
> Thanks for your help and guidance in advance,
> 
> Paul Roberts
> -- 
>       ______
>      /_____/\
>     /_____\\ \                Paul Roberts
>    /_____\ \\ /               Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>   /_____/ \/ / /              Sun Serviceability and Readiness Ops
>  /_____/ /   \//\
>  \_____\//\   / /             email:  p.roberts at sun.com 
> <mailto:p.roberts at sun.com>
>   \_____/ / /\ /              direct: 877-477-7642
>    \_____/ \\ \              
>     \_____\ \\                
>      \_____\/                http://www.sun.com <http://www.sun.com/>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ldoms-discuss mailing list
> ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss
_______________________________________________
ldoms-discuss mailing list
ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss



      
_______________________________________________
ldoms-discuss mailing list
ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss

Reply via email to