Hi Fajar,
Thanks for your speedy response.
Do you mean there is no different between application running inside LDom
and non-LDom in terms of core/cpu-based licensing.
Yes, virtulization technology bring a challenge to the tradition license
scheme.
> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:21:36 +0700
> Subject: Re: [ldoms-discuss] FW: licence issue on ldoms
> From: fajar at fajar.net
> To: bilishr at hotmail.com
> CC: ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
> 2009/11/30 JoeBilish <bilishr at hotmail.com>:
> > From the customer view of point. If the license is base on number of
> > cores,
>
> > If it difficult to implement this scheme, do you know any other
> > license scheme to support virtualization?
>
> AFAIK even Oracle, IBM, dan MS don't put hardcoded limit in terms of
> core/cpu-based licensing, so it's more of a legal thing instead of a
> technical thing.
>
> --
> Fajar
_________________________________________________________________
?Windows Live ???????Messenger2009????
http://www.windowslive.cn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ldoms-discuss/attachments/20091130/fdc8ac6b/attachment-0001.html>